اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite Facebook Twitter

Advanced

EMG shareholders sue Egypt for ending Israel gas deal
Published Thursday 03/05/2012 (updated) 16/05/2012 18:30
Egyptian protester sprays "Down Israel" on wall of Israeli embassy in Cairo.

JERUSALEM (Reuters) -- International shareholders in East Mediterranean Gas, the company that oversaw the now defunct Egyptian-Israeli natural gas deal, said on Thursday they were suing the government of Egypt for violating three bilateral investment treaties.

The decision to take legal action against the Egyptian government under treaties with the United States, Poland and Germany is the strongest move so far by the group, ensuring the dispute is handled diplomatically and not just commercially.

Egyptian state-owned oil and gas companies announced on April 22 the termination of gas sales to Israel, which were part of a 20-year deal, following a year of sabotage and pipeline attacks that had already disrupted supplies.

Israeli and Egyptian officials have tried to play down the ending of the 2005 deal, saying the cancellation of the contract supplying Israel with 40 percent of its gas needs resulted from a business dispute.

However, there have been growing public calls within Egypt to review ties with Israel since the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak, for whom a peace treaty with Israel was a cornerstone of regional policy.

Thursday's announcement came after months of unsuccessful attempts to resolve the issue through negotiation, one of the shareholders, Ampal-American Israel Corp, said.

Egypt's Foreign Ministry could not immediately be reached for comment.

The investors, who include Thai energy giant PTT, US businessman Sam Zell and Israel's Merhav, are also suing the Egyptian oil and gas companies. Together they are seeking up to $8 billion in damages.

"The investors' disputes with Egypt arise out of a series of acts and failures by the government of Egypt that have seriously undermined the value of the investors' investments in EMG," Ampal said in a statement.

The underwater pipeline, which EMG spent about $500 million on building, had been targeted by militants in Egypt's unruly Sinai peninsula numerous times, halting the flow of gas for most of the past year.

In 2010, prior to the attacks, EMG provided 2.5 billion cubic meters of gas to Israeli customers. But that number was expected to more than double throughout the 20-year deal.

Israel's energy sector will likely be hurt in the short term, but the country has been weaning itself off the once-crucial supplies and has a number of contingency plans that will lessen the impact.

US-based Ampal said it had submitted a request for arbitration to the World Bank's International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes in accordance with the Egyptian-US bilateral treaty.

Ampal's chairman, Israeli magnate Yossi Maiman, is also a Polish national, and a German citizen is invested in EMG as well, allowing the group to seek compensation under the Polish and German treaties, the statement said.

Egypt Natural Gas Co is a also a shareholder in EMG.
Print Send to friend
1 ) Mel / USA
03/05/2012 16:18
That wasn't a mutually beneficial gas deal,for the WHOLE Egyptian people.The military junta leaders essentially GAVE Egyptian gas FREE to Israel.Far below market price,for DECADES.To the fiscal benefit of Egyptian elite,but attritioning millions of ordinary people(swapping it for US-Israeli-EU weapons,instead of quality of life for majority Egyptians).Israel probably OWES Egypt 8 BILLION?And,USG & Israel're in NO position to quibble about dishonoring "treaties",LOL!

2 ) Gaymer Kharken / Malaysia
04/05/2012 11:12
The plaintiffs will argue to the World Bank's International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, that the pipeline was breached 14 times, and security of the pipeline was left in the hands of unskilled Sinai Bedouin brigands.

3 ) FOURTEEN / TIMES
05/05/2012 18:45
The EMG shareholders should sue the cause of the problem, rather than the Egyptian government that couldn't control them. The EMG shareholders should sue the Islamic parties in Egypt and the Islamic government in Gaza, that worked together in BOMBING THE EMG GAS LINES FOURTEEN TIMES !!!!

4 ) Lukas / AntiZionist
06/05/2012 16:57
Egypt has all rights to abolish a neocolonial deal that was devastating to itself, selling gas to a criminal entity below market prices. The bombing of the pipeline was the right thing to do. Nobody knows who bombed, but those who did are heroes.

5 ) Colin Wright / USA
10/05/2012 02:06
To Mel #1 'Israel're in NO position to quibble about dishonoring "treaties",LOL!' Hear hear. If Israel ever did keep a promise, it was only because it happened to be convenient to do so. The history of Zionism is essentially a history of promises made and then broken. One can start with Weizman's assurance in 1920 or so that the Zionists did not aspire to an independent state...

6 ) @ Lukas-4 / Anti-TERRORIST
16/05/2012 15:47
Bombing is neither the answer for Egypt's pipeline, nor for Gaza's truck-line of fuel from Israel. That is just TERROR.

And, if "Egypt has rights to abolish a deal that was NOT devastating
to itself", but WAS part of a legal agreement between states,
that also transferred lands (Sinai Penn.) from Israel to Egypt,
then the Sinai should go back to the previous holder - Israel.

7 ) Lukas / AntiZionist
16/05/2012 17:35
Hey, no. 6, your arguments bear no ground. The gas deal is not a part of the "peace agreement". On top of that any country has the right to revise foreign agreements. You should refer to your own terrorism and reflect about Operation Cast Lead. You are the terrorists and brought terror to the Middle East in the first place.
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content. Click here for more details.

Share/Bookmark

PA finance minister meets Israeli counterpart
PA official warns of worsening financial crisis
Hamdallah says government to boost development

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2013