اجعلنا صفحة البداية RSS خدمة Add to favorite

Advanced

From Gaza to Obama: An open letter - Haidar Eid
Published Sunday 15/11/2009 (updated) 17/11/2009 21:58
Font- Font+
Barack and Michelle Obama dine with Edward
and Mariam Said at a 1998 Arab community event in Chicago
Dear Mr President,

You will probably not read this letter due to your busy schedule and the huge number of messages you receive from presidents, kings, princes, sheiks, and prime ministers. Who is a Palestinian academic from Gaza, after all, to have the guts and write an open letter to the president of the United States of America?

What has triggered this letter is a picture of your excellency sitting with the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said. That, of course, happened before 2004, i.e. before you underwent a process of metamorphosis which I personally think is unprecedented in history. Seeing you with Edward Said, I must say, surprised me. Said, a true public intellectual must have said something to you about the suffering of the Palestinian people. In the picture, you and your wife seem to be listening attentively, and admiringly, to him. But the point remains; did you really understand his eloquent, passionate defense of the rights of the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine? Judging from your recent policy shifts, I very much doubt it. It is precisely the incongruity between the photograph and these policy shifts that has prompted this letter.

Mr President,

The whole world celebrated your election as the first African-American president of the US. I did not. Neither did the inhabitants of the concentration camp where I live. Your sympathetic visit to Sderot—an Israeli town which was the Palestinian village of Najd until 1948 when its people were ethnically cleansed—three years after your first visit to a Kibbutz in northern Israel in support of its residents, and after your pledge to be committed to the security of the State of Israel and its "right" to retain unified Jerusalem as the capital city of the Jewish people—to give but few examples—were all clear indications of where your heart lies.

Another reason for the writing of this letter is shock at the indifference and arrogance with which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dismissed Palestinian concerns about Israel's illegal Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank. Only a few weeks ago you made the admirable statement that all Jewish settlement must halt, and you made it clear that this included expansion of existing settlements as well as the construction of new settlements. However, when Netanyahu let it be known that he had no intention of stopping settlements, you missed an historic opportunity to draw a line: no more billions and no more weapons for Israel unless and until this condition is met. Now Clinton has the Herculean task of pretending that your position on Jewish settlements has not changed, although it is clear you have chosen not to use the very real power at your disposal to bring Israeli policy into line.

About six months after your election, you gave a speech in Cairo, addressed to the Arab and Islamic worlds; which some people found impressive. I found it impressive in form, but not in substance because your actions have not matched your rhetoric. Why did I not buy the new language of the new American administration? Because while you were giving your speech, we were burying my neighbor, a terminally ill patient, who needed treatment in a hospital abroad, since, thanks to the siege imposed by your own administration and Israel on the Gaza Strip, the facilities that would have saved his life are not available in Gaza. Like more than 400 terminally ill people in Gaza, my neighbor lost his life. In spite of the fine Arabic words of peace, “salaam aleikum,” you made it crystal clear that the point of reference in any negotiations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is Israel's security. By doing that, Mr President, you are effectively marginalizing the whole issue of Palestine, and unfortunately setting the stage for renewed Israeli assaults against a starving Gaza, an entity that has, thanks to your "unbreakable” ties with Israel, been transformed into the largest concentration camp on earth.

Your failure to support the Goldstone report, your indifference, not to say your contribution, to Palestinian suffering and the process of “politicide” against the Palestinian people of Gaza is, to say the least, unfathomable, coming from a man who listened so earnestly to Edward Said. Your advisors must have told you about the cutting off of medicine, food and fuel to the concentration camp where I live. Patients in need of dialysis and other urgent medical treatment are dying every single day. A majority of our children, many the same age as your two beautiful daughters, are badly undernourished.

You must have skimmed through the executive summary of the Goldstone report detailing the horror inflicted on 1.5 million civilians for 22 days, horror caused by F16s, Apache helicopters, and phosphorus bombs made in American factories. Hundreds of children were burnt to death by phosphorus bombs; pregnant women were brutally targeted in what Israeli soldiers boasted of on their T-Shirts: "One bullet, Two kills." And yet, not a single word of sympathy, Mr President! Edward Said had this to say upon his first visit to Gaza: "It’s the most terrifying place I’ve ever been in… it’s a horrifyingly sad place because of the desperation and misery of the way people live. I was unprepared for camps that are much worse than anything I saw in South Africa." This was back in 1993, Mr President, before conditions dramatically deteriorated. Gaza has now become, as the leading Israeli human rights organization B'tselem describes it, “the largest prison on Earth.”

Mr Obama,

Unlike your predecessor, you seem to be a smart man. You must have realized that a two-state solution has been rendered impossible by Israeli colonization of the West Bank, by the war on Gaza, by the construction of the apartheid wall, by the expansion of so-called Greater Jerusalem, and by the increase in the number of Jewish settlers in the West Bank. You must have realized also that there are six million refugees, most of whom live in miserable conditions waiting for courageous, visionary leaders committed to true democracy, human rights and international law to implement UN resolution 194. And yet, you and your secretary of state, like every US president since 1967, have decided to support Israel in creating conditions that made the two-state solution impossible, impractical and unjust.

Were you a supporter of the bantustan system in South Africa under the apartheid system? Are you opposed to equal rights and the transformation of Israel/Palestine into a state for all its citizens? The two-state solution means the bantustanization of Palestine, a solution you, to our knowledge, never supported for South Africa. Are you, Mr President, opposed to civic democracy, which is the demand of most Palestinian civil society and grassroots organizations? This is what your role models, Martin Luther King Jr and Steve Biko, died for. Was Nelson Mandela wrong to spend 27 years of his life in pursuit of justice by demanding equality for the indigenous people of South Africa? Do you realize that what you are supporting in the Middle East is a racist solution par excellence? A solution based on ethnic nationalism. Your secretary of state and envoy to the Middle East, unashamedly, stood with beaming smiles next to Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who not only defends openly the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, but also calls for a new genocide in Gaza. Do you realize, Mr President, that this Hitlerite fascist might become Israel's next prime minister, thanks to your administration's complacency and support?

Our only immediate demand is that your administration ensures that Israel fulfills its obligations in terms of international law. Is that too much to ask?

Mr President Barack Hussein Obama,

We, the Palestinian people, are fed up!

Sincerely,

Professor Haidar Eid
Gaza, Palestine


The author is an independent political commentator and professor in the Department of English Literature at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza.
Print Send to friend
1 ) Juile / USA
15/11/2009 13:01
Prof Eid, your articulations here are notably significant. Your letter weaves a potent tapestry of facts in a masterful approach. Obama is smart enough that if his desire to seek reliable peace was authentic, you wouldn't need to write a word. I hope you submit this letter to other key news sources.

2 ) huh / no man's land
15/11/2009 13:46
Well said, Mr Eid.

3 ) Brian T. Manning / AUSTRALIA
15/11/2009 14:20
Barack Obama generated so much hope on his election he could well have rivalled Jesus Christ as the messiah.
What a disappointment !!

4 ) chil / usa
15/11/2009 16:34
the moment obama recognize abbas as the pres of the PA after jan. 9, 09 when his presidency expired showed me that obama is a uncle tom and has no respect for democracy. when hamas won elections what did the usa do, punish the pal peopl by starving them out. this is the respect that obama has 4 dem.

5 ) Mike / S.Africa
15/11/2009 20:15
Very well argued. The end of apartheid looked too far in the mid 80's. Now, Prof. Eid, Obama is not a visionary leader who can see the end of the Zionist enterprise; neither did Reagan see the end of apartheid in the 80's. Your letter should be read by all American politicians. Wishfull thinking!

6 ) Mona bauwens / Uk via Gaza
17/11/2009 00:00
Superb . If only our leaders had the courage to express this

7 ) Majdy / Palestine
17/11/2009 07:25
What a letter! Palestinian leaders should read it before Obama. Thye need to learn how to communicate with the Americans. This lettter is a good lesson for them.

8 ) Cecile / France
17/11/2009 17:20
You're right. It's a very good letter expressing all the anger and disappointment that you and thousands of other people feel about our President (I am American). I agree with you and support with all my heart the Palestinian cause but I have not given up on President Obama. I also believe in him.

9 ) Tatyana / USA
17/11/2009 19:45
I would be interested to know what a palestinian imagines a united Isreal/Palestine like. As a jew, I honestly believe that as soon as the borders open, Hamas and their like will start to execute their plan to kill all the jews and push them out to the sea. Is that not a reasonable assumption?

10 ) Roger Lafontaine / USA
17/11/2009 19:56
Thank you for your letter. It will be ignored of course and America and Israel will miss the chance to raise themselves up to a higher level of wisdom, essential for our common survival in this coming time. Yet these things must be recorded in the book of Time and your letter does that for posterity

11 ) Creidim / Canada
17/11/2009 21:37
No it's not. It's the same fear-mongering that the Loyalists used when Britain signalled their willingness to negotiate with the IRA (political wing) The Troubles lasted longer than Israel has existed, and yet you didn't see mass attacks after they came to a settlement that was FAIR to both parties

12 ) Tatyana / USA
18/11/2009 00:00
Was the pullout from Gaza not a good first step? Was it not a signal that fair agreement might come in the future? Why then did the rockets come in return?

13 ) Creidim / Canada
18/11/2009 01:38
12: Israel pulled out, and then years later, contrary to their love of democracy, as soon as Hamas was ELECTED by the people, Israel intensified the blockade, and demonstrated that they only wanted a Palestinian power if it would be subservient to Israel.

14 ) Tatyana / USA
18/11/2009 16:34
13, One can love democracy and be at war with a democratically elected government. Gazans elected a government whose charter calls for destruction of Israel, after Gaza was evacuated of all jews. Why wouldn't any future agreements and sacrifices result in more of the same?

15 ) Creidim / Canada
18/11/2009 19:59
14: 1. I disagree with the language in their charter, but you have to realize the environment which spawned them, it is the duty of an occupied people to resist with any means available (violence being the last resort) and after watching the PLO's 'agreements' work counter to national interest....

16 ) Creidim / Canada
18/11/2009 20:02
14: (cont) There was a strong feeling then (as now) that as long as Palestine was left where it had to gain the Occupiers assent for everything, and that Israel would never let Palestine 'control' it's own people, airwaves, economy, or military, that resistance is all that's left.

17 ) chil / usa
18/11/2009 20:07
tatyana when they left gaza they put up a blockade the very same day. they closed off the sea route to the world, they denied the pals the right to fly out of gaza and they shut the crossings with egypt help.and this was b4 the 06' elections. so u need to go read b4 u type.

18 ) chil / usa
18/11/2009 20:09
when u leave a place and then u deny the people freedom to leave gaza and freely interact with the world then u in fact have not left the place. you left inside of gaza but u control the air,land and sea routes out of gaza so you effectively control gaza, and this is all b4 the 06' elections.

19 ) Tatyana / USA
18/11/2009 21:32
I do read. My sources say that in nov 2005 PA and Israel came to agreement to allow greater freedom of movement in Gaza and construction of a new airport seaport. The crossings were supposedly open until 2007. Both our countries are listed as USA, so we don't know which source is right.

20 ) Creidim / USA
18/11/2009 21:36
It is understandable that occupation breeds resistance. Yet arab-jewish violence predates the war of 67 and even the state of Israel. Jews do not hate arabs, Israelis dont hate palestinians, but continued violence has bred an understandable desire not to cohabitate, or be in a vulnerable position.

21 ) chil / usa
18/11/2009 22:09
r u serious tatyana, what ship left gaza between 05 and 07. what airplane have u seen take off between 05 and 07. germans said that jews were being deported but the facts on the ground said the jews were being mass murdered. talk is talk actions are facts

22 ) Mike / S.Africa
18/11/2009 22:55
Tatyan's argument reminds one of White fear of living with darkies, of "black violence". In a word, it is a racist argument par excellence! The letter is quite moderate and honest

23 ) Tatyana / USA
21/11/2009 20:58
Living in US i don't have the line of sight to gaza skyline or coastline. i do not know what ships took off and what planes left. I do remember both sides reporting that certain crossings were closed after each rocket attack. My logic might be flawed, but you can't close an already closed crossing.

24 ) Tatyana / USA
21/11/2009 21:07
I'm sorry if my argument seems racist, but I don't remember the last time an australian sent rockets from Gaza, or blew up a bus up in Tel Aviv. When one does I'll ask how Israelis can live together in peace with Australians without fear of violence.

25 ) Gloria Spicer / United Kingdom
25/11/2009 13:59
Dear Taty, The settlers left Gaza, one percent of historic Palestine and went to the West Bank, also Palestinian soil. An empty gesture that fooled nobody but you. They were, and are still, occupying stolen land - so they weren't doing anyone any favours!

26 ) Gloria Spicer / UK
25/11/2009 14:02
By the way Tatyana, Australia is a good example of a white colonial settler society founded on the corpses and destruction of indigenous peoples - just like Israel.

27 ) Bob / Canada
26/11/2009 11:07
26, I never knew that Australian Aboriginals lived in the land of Israel before the Jews have returned to their homeland, as promised in Surah 17 , Verse 104 in the Koran.

28 ) AlElder / Canada
26/11/2009 11:36
To Tatyana/USA:
Isn't this what Jews did to Palestinians in 1948?
Name Country
Comment
Characters
Note: Comments will be reviewed for appropriate content.

Share/Bookmark

Silent occupation - Ali Jumuah
National reconciliation imminent - Ahmad Yousef
A four-letter word - Uri Avnery

Close Next Previous
All Rights Reserved © Ma'an News Agency 2005 - 2010